Chapter 1: Introducing government failure
Government, of whatever kind, is supposed to take the interests of all members of society to heart. In a way, that can be seen as the main impetus the Magna Carta of 1215 gave society – it curtailed and steered the mandate of a king so he would not govern for his own good only. Indeed, Thomas Hobbes, in his Leviathan (1651), claimed that Leviathan, or a government, is the only possibility to prevent man from living in ‘continual fear, and danger of violent death’ and making ‘the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short’. While Leviathan is the biblical sea-beast that many equate to the devil himself, and although Hobbes seemed to favour some kind of despotism, harking back to Plato’s Republic (268 bc), Leviathan was considered to have a beneficial effect on society. A government, or individual Principe (Macchiavelli, 1513) in its place, serving society’s interests, can then use whatever means necessary towards both outsiders as well as members of that society itself. Thomas More’s Utopia (1516), in identifying what an ideal society would look like, does not seem to agree with Hobbes that any type of government, issuing any set of rules, would need to be welcomed as long as the rules would apply to any and all.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.