Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Shareholder Power

Research Handbook on Shareholder Power

Research Handbooks in Corporate Law and Governance series

Edited by Jennifer G. Hill and Randall S. Thomas

Much of the history of corporate law has concerned itself not with shareholder power, but rather with its absence. Yet, as this Handbook shows, there have been major shifts in capital market structure that require a reassessment of the role and power of shareholders. This book provides a contemporary analysis of shareholder power and considers the regulatory consequences of changing ownership patterns around the world. Leading international scholars in corporate law, governance and financial economics address these central issues from a range of different perspectives including historical, contemporary, legal, economic, political and comparative.

Chapter 4: Thirty years of evolution in the roles of institutional investors in corporate governance

John C. Coates IV

Subjects: law - academic, corporate law and governance


A stylized fact that informs most writing about corporate governance in the US and the UK is that institutional investors became more important over the 20th century. Another is that institutions hold larger blocks than individuals. The implication is that shareholders of public companies are less dispersed and more apt to act collectively than was true previously. To be sure, legal constraints (e.g. Black 1992; Roe 1994) and economic disincentives (e.g. Rock 1991) impede collective action. But a belief that increased institutional ownership and decreased dispersion would lead to shareholders overall playing a more important and active role in corporate governance has long been conventional (e.g. Black 1990). More recently (e.g. Gilson and Gordon, Chapter 2 this volume) others have presented a more complex story in which the evolution of institutional ownership does signal increased power, but in less straightforward ways than aggregate reductions in dispersion. This chapter builds on that theme, presenting evidence that shifts in the composition and roles of institutions have been at least as important, if not more so, than aggregate increases in institutional ownership. Over the past 30 years institutions have come to play more varied roles in governance, due to increased specialization in institutional forms and functions, and particularly an increase in ‘layers’ of institutions – namely, institutions owning institutions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information