Intellectual Property for Economic Development

Intellectual Property for Economic Development

KDI series in Economic Policy and Development

Edited by Sanghoon Ahn, Bronwyn H. Hall and Keun Lee

Protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs) serves a dual role in economic development. While it promotes innovation by providing legal protection of inventions, it may retard catch-up and learning by restricting the diffusion of innovations. Does stronger IPR protection in a developing country encourage technology development in or technology transfer to that country? This book aims to address the issue, covering diverse forms of IPRs, diverse actors in innovation, and diverse cases from Asia and Latin America.

Chapter 11: Propensity to patent, competition and China’s foreign patenting surge

Albert Hu

Subjects: economics and finance, development economics, intellectual property, law and economics, innovation and technology, intellectual property

Extract

Foreign applications for patents issued by China’s State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) have seen explosive growth. From 1995 to 2004, foreign – primarily OECD and the Asian newly industrialized economies – applications for and grants received of Chinese invention patents had been growing at over 30 percent a year. Of these applications, over 90 percent have claimed foreign priority, which implies that patent applications had earlier been filed for the invention with a foreign jurisdiction. During the same period of time, patent applications at the US Patents and Trademark Office were growing at about 5 percent a year. Apparently foreign inventors are seeking to protect an increasing proportion of their patents in China. A number of forces could have contributed to the increasing foreign propensity to patent in China: strengthening of patent protection in China over time, expansion of foreign economic activities in China – foreign direct investment (FDI) and trade – imitative and innovative threat from domestic Chinese firms, and competition from other foreign firms in the Chinese market. It is hard to assess how the efficacy of intellectual property rights (IPR) enforcement in China has evolved over the years. Reported incidences of IPR violation might be a result of strengthened enforcement that leads to better detection of violation as well as rampant piracy. I will have little to say about the patent enforcement mechanism in China, and to the extent that it is an economy-wide concern, it will not be central to my industry-level analysis. I will instead focus on the other potential explanations.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information