Table of Contents

Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy

Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy

Handbooks of Research on Public Policy series

Edited by Robert Geyer and Paul Cairney

Though its roots in the natural sciences go back to the early 20th century, complexity theory as a scientific framework has developed most rapidly since the 1970s. Increasingly, complexity theory has been integrated into the social sciences, and this groundbreaking Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy has brought together top thinkers in complexity and policy from around the world. With contributions from Europe, North America, Brazil and China this comprehensive Handbook splits the topic into three cohesive parts: Theory and Tools, Methods and Modeling, and Application.

Chapter 23: A case study of complexity and health policy: planning for a pandemic

Ben Gray

Subjects: politics and public policy, public administration and management, public policy


The health sector has achieved many things by applying a reductionist approach to understanding health problems. People who can see following cataract surgery, who have been cured of TB with anti-tuberculous drugs or saved from smallpox because it was eradicated by immunization, have a lot to be grateful for. As a result of these successes the provision of healthcare in most Western countries is dominated by a reductionist approach of relying on ‘specialization’ to provide services, valuing detailed knowledge about a narrow area of human function over an understanding of the whole. There is increasing emphasis on ‘Evidence Based Medicine’ of which the gold standard evidence is the meta-analysis of multiple randomized controlled trials (Sackett et al., 1996). This is a method that relies on trying to eliminate all variables except one to study the outcome. There is also a focus on ‘universal’ ethical principles for doctors to follow, at least in the majority of cases. Medical practitioners are encouraged to adopt the same solution to individual problems based on the evidence and universal ethical principles. Yet the results of these trials and principles do not provide an adequate set of rules for practitioners to follow. They may be useful to address simple problems in which there is a universal solution, but not complicated or complex problems which defy simple solutions.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information