Table of Contents

Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment

Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment

Research Handbooks on Impact Assessment series

Edited by Claire A. Dunlop and Claudio M. Radaelli

This comparative Handbook provides a pioneering and comprehensive account of regulatory impact assessment – the main instrument used by governments and regulators to appraise the likely effects of their policy proposals. Renowned international scholars and practitioners describe the substance of impact assessment, situating it in its proper theoretical traditions and scrutinizing its usage across countries, policy sectors, and policy instruments. The Handbook of Regulatory Impact Assessment will undoubtedly be of great value to practitioners and also scholars with its wealth of detail and lessons to be learned.

Chapter 9: Courts and regulatory impact assessment

Alberto Alemanno

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy, regulation and governance


In line with the principle of separation of powers, policy-makers and courts have very different jobs. Yet, their respective inputs to the fabrics of government are not totally exclusive but complementary to one another: the output of the former’s work, that is, regulation, is subject to the scrutiny of the latter, through judicial review. It is against this backdrop that this chapter discusses whether and how the increasing use of impact assessment by policy-makers in the preparation of policy proposals may affect courts when called upon to judge the legality of those initiatives and what this may entail for the legal system. Rather than discuss whether courts should (or should not) judicialize impact assessment (IA), this chapter explores the actual consequences stemming from the progressive integration of IA within the judicial context. It does so on the assumption that what IA has to offer courts is more than what courts may offer to IA: judicialization. Today it is indeed a truism to say that the act of judging involves more than the application of legal rules to individual cases. Thus, it will be demonstrated that while IA is not itself a procedural mechanism (like casting a vote or asking for advice) for making decisions, it provides – regardless of its formal legal status – substantive, and in some jurisdictions determinative, input into the legal process to the point of transforming it.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information