Table of Contents

Handbook of Water Economics

Handbook of Water Economics

Edited by Ariel Dinar and Kurt Schwabe

Water scarcity, whether in the quality or quantity dimension, afflicts most countries. Decisions on water management and allocation over time, space, and among uses and users involve economic considerations. This Handbook assembles research that represents recent thinking and applications in water economics. The book chapters are written by leading scholars in the field who address issues related to its use, management, and value. The topics cover analytical methods, sectoral and intersectoral water issues, and issues associated with different sources of water.

Chapter 16: Nonmarket valuation and water resource management

Richard T. Carson

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, environment, water


Almost all water projects have a monetary cost and produce a vector of outputs. Benefit–cost analysis requires that all of these outputs be measured in monetary terms. It is hoped that most of these outputs, like reduction of flood risk, are desirable; but undesirable outcomes, like loss of habitat, can also occur. Some of these outputs, such as electricity, are readily valued in monetary terms by using their market price. Others, like supplying irrigation water, can refer to contractual prices or estimate their influence on profits by taking account of their marginal value in the production process. Still others, like recreational fishing and preservation of an endangered species, are not bought and sold in the marketplace and need to be valued using nonmarket valuation techniques (Champ et al., 2003; Freeman et al., 2014). This chapter looks at the use of these techniques in the context of water projects. The notion of measuring and comparing the benefits and costs of a water project appears to have been first formalized in the 1902 US River and Harbor Act, which required a board of engineers to consider project benefits and costs. This Act distinguished between local/special and national/general benefits for the purpose of local cost sharing.1 The US Flood Control Act of 1936 formalizes the need for a benefit–cost assessment with its requirement that a project’s ‘benefits to whomsoever they may accrue must exceed the costs’.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information