Table of Contents

Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice

Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice

From Swords to Ploughshares

Elgar Law and Entrepreneurship series

Edited by Lateef Mtima

In the Information Age, historically marginalized groups and developing nations continue to strive for socio-economic empowerment within the global community. Their ultimate success largely depends upon their ability to develop, protect, and exploit their greatest natural resource: intellectual property. Through an exploration of the techniques used in social entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, Entrepreneurship and Social Justice provides a framework by which historically marginalized communities and developing nations can cooperate with the developed world to establish a socially cohesive global intellectual property order. The knowledgeable contributors discuss, in four parts, topics surrounding entrepreneurship and empowerment, education and advocacy, engagement and activism and, finally, commencement.

Chapter 4: The colorblind marketplace?

Shubha Ghosh

Subjects: business and management, social entrepreneurship, law - academic, intellectual property law, law and society


“Our Constitution is color blind”, Justice Harlan famously exhorted in his dissent to the Supreme Court’s opinion upholding state policies of separate but equal facilities for whites and nonwhites in Plessy v. Ferguson. Over the nearly century and half since, color blindness has evolved into a constitutional principle undermining state actions that seek to segregate and differentiate among persons based on racial characteristics. Blindness to color has expanded to gender equality and a disregard to other inherent characteristics by the state in its distribution of benefits and imposition of burdens. The colorblind principle, however, has come under scrutiny by legal scholars and policymakers as it serves to block progressive policies designed to integrate public institutions and promote racial and cultural diversity. Some scholars have gone further to claim that colorblindness serves to enforce racial hierarchies with white culture, or even the white race, being the norm and color as a mark of difference. Defenders of colorblindness, on the other hand, claim that any mention of race is itself racist, including any accusation of racism. There is a vertiginous circularity to a strong adherence to the colorblind principle, especially when used to block any government policies that seek to remedy past discrimination. Central to the controversies over colorblindness is the value of diversity. Affirmative action policies, particularly in the area of school admissions, may have justification in the promotion of diversity.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information