Chapter 40: Security
This chapter offers a review of the literature in the field of critical security studies in order to discuss the various social constructions of climate change as a security issue and their policy implications. Will climate security discourse facilitate climate mitigation policy? First, the Copenhagen School asks whether extraordinary measures to protect the climate (including emission reductions) are legitimized as a result of security speech acts by elites, but cannot find any successful ‘securitization.’ A second approach analyses security discourses by referent objects, distinguishing human security, national security, international security and ecological security discourses, each of which is linked a priori to certain policy implications. It argues that human security discourse could facilitate climate mitigation action, but that it is unfortunately not the dominant discourse. Third, a governmentality analysis asks how changing constructions of danger evoke different modes of securing. A governmentality perspective shows that the construction of climate change as inevitable climate ‘terror’ has facilitated resilience thinking and adaptation policies rather than mitigation action. Fourth, a post-politics approach suggests that security discourse is in fact a populist endeavor, externalizing the problem of climate change and thereby leaving the capitalist system of production unchanged.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.