The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law

The Principle of National Treatment in International Economic Law

Trade, Investment and Intellectual Property

European Intellectual Property Institutes Network series

Edited by Anselm Kamperman Sanders

The principle of national treatment, or the non-discrimination clause, is a principle that applies across many fields of international economic law. This book offers a unique horizontal examination of the principle as it applies within international trade law, international investment law, and intellectual property law. An invaluable conclusion draws together the common strands and highlights the variations in application between these fields.

Chapter 9: National treatment in copyright and related rights: How much work does it do?

Robert Brauneis

Subjects: law - academic, european law, intellectual property law, international economic law, trade law, international investment law

Extract

The obligation of national treatment makes an appearance in all five of the major active multilateral treaties concerning copyright and related rights, including the Berne Convention, the Rome Convention, the TRIPS Agreement, the WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), and the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), a group I will collectively call the “five CRR treaties.” The national treatment principle has been praised in part for its administrative convenience: it “allows [a treaty] member and its courts to apply their own law – the law they are familiar with.” Yet it is principally lauded for its substantive bite, as a rule requiring that treaty parties extend protection to non-nationals on the same terms as they do to their own nationals. It is that bite that commentators have in mind when they suggest that the “fundamental principle of the [Berne] Convention was national treatment,”or that “[t]he national treatment and MFN principles are cornerstones of the WTO legal system, including TRIPS.” Behind that sweeping rhetoric, however, there are reasons to question whether the national treatment obligations imposed by the five CRR treaties remain of paramount importance in practice. Together, those treaties now contain far more specific substantive minimum guarantees than the Berne Convention did in its first incarnation in 1886.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information