Table of Contents

Handbook of Sustainability Assessment

Handbook of Sustainability Assessment

Research Handbooks on Impact Assessment series

Edited by Angus Morrison-Saunders, Jenny Pope and Alan Bond

The Handbook of Sustainability Assessment introduces the theory and practice of sustainability assessment and showcases the state-of-the-art research. The aim is to provide inspiration and guidance to students, academics and practitioners alike and to contribute to the enhancement of sustainability assessment practice worldwide. It emphasises how traditional impact assessment practices can be enhanced to contribute to sustainable outcomes. Featuring original contributions from leading sustainability assessment researchers and practitioners, it forms part of the Research Handbooks on Impact Assessment series.

Chapter 11: Multicriteria analysis for sustainability assessment: concepts and case studies

Davide Geneletti and Valentina Ferretti

Subjects: business and management, management and sustainability, environment, environmental management, environmental sociology


Essentially, multicriteria analysis (MCA) is a method to support decision making, by exploring the balance between the pros and cons of different alternatives. The comparison of alternatives is based upon a set of explicitly formulated criteria, which represent aspects of the alternatives that need to be taken into account during decision making. The term “alternative” is used here in a general meaning to include all types of options, choices or courses of action to accomplish particular goals (Steinemann, 2001). It can be argued that sustainability assessment – broadly defined as a process that directs decision making towards sustainability (Bond and Morrison-Saunders, 2011, derived from Hacking and Guthrie, 2008) – should always include the consideration and comparison of some forms of alternatives. These alternatives can be related, for example, to “different possible purposes, different locations and design, different general approaches to serving the selected purpose, different locations and designs, different packages of mitigation and enhancement components, and different implementation plans” (Gibson et al., 2005, p. 126). More specifically, MCA assists in framing decision problems, illustrating the performance of the alternatives across all criteria, exploring trade-offs, formulating a decision, and testing its robustness. All this is while considering, on the one hand, the “analytical” performance of the alternatives across all criteria and, on the other hand, the preferences and opinions of the stakeholders involved in the decision-making process.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information