Table of Contents

Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy – 2014

Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy – 2014

Annals in Entrepreneurship Education series

Edited by Michael H. Morris

A sizable gap exists between the ample demands for (and growing supply of) entrepreneurship education and our understanding of how to best approach the teaching and learning of entrepreneurship. To help close this gap, the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (USASBE) has identified some of the most important and provocative work on entrepreneurship education over the years, and worked with the authors of this work to produce updated perspectives. The intent is to capture the richest insights and best practices in teaching entrepreneurship, building entrepreneurship curricula, and developing educational programs.

Chapter 5: The curricular confusion between entrepreneurship education and small business management: a qualitative analysis

George Solomon and Charles Matthews

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, management education, education, management education


In the 1980s ‘strategic planning’ was the hot topic among both academic researchers and executives of complex organizations. Strategic planners were hired in droves. When Jack Welch became the CEO of General Electric, he discovered over 250 strategic planners at the corporate headquarters. This state of affairs led renowned academic scholar Henry Mintzberg to pen a bitingly astute book chapter titled: ‘If strategic planning is everything, then perhaps it is nothing’ (Mintzberg, 1994). The still emerging academic discipline of entrepreneurship now finds itself with a terminological issue brought on by the excessive use and overuse of the words ‘entrepreneur’, ‘entrepreneurship’, as well as the overuse and misuse of the word ‘entrepreneurial’. It is the misuse of the adjective ‘entrepreneurial’ that has been the most damaging as it is now used synonymously with creative and innovative and is often used gratuitously as a meaningless modifier (for example, an entrepreneurial campus, entrepreneurial finance, or entrepreneurial spread sheet). Perhaps an article will soon be written that parallels Mintzberg’s critique of two decades ago, titled, ‘If entrepreneurship is everything, then perhaps it is nothing’. When entrepreneurship was an incipient academic discipline, Bill Gartner’s 1988 article ‘‘Who is an entrepreneur is the wrong question’ freed researchers to proceed with necessary exploration and overcome pedantic paralysis. Now, as an adolescent, the field can productively revisit Gartner’s definitional debate.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information