Table of Contents

Predicting the Future in Science, Economics, and Politics

Predicting the Future in Science, Economics, and Politics

Edited by Frank Whelon Wayman, Paul R. Williamson, Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Solomon Polachek

It is a puzzle that while academic research has increased in specialization, the important and complex problems facing humans urgently require a synthesis of understanding. This unique collaboration attempts to address such a problem by bringing together a host of prominent scholars from across the sciences to offer new insights into predicting the future. They demonstrate that long-term trends and short-term incentives need to be understood in order to adopt effective policies, or even to comprehend where we currently stand and the sort of future that awaits us.

Chapter 8: Forecasting nuclear weapons proliferation: a hazard model

Atsushi Tago and J. David Singer

Subjects: economics and finance, game theory, international economics, politics and public policy, international politics, international relations, public policy


From the original test of the first atomic device in the New Mexico desert on July 16, 1945 to the present day, the creation, testing, and deployment of these weapons has generated an extraordinary amount of discussion, debate, speculation, and research. On the positive side, we are told that by dropping the very primitive first two bombs on Hiroshima and then on Nagasaki in August 1945 the US was able to bring Japan to surrender and thus avoid the costly island-hopping campaign that could have taken more than a year and perhaps at the cost of thousands of American and Japanese fatalities. In addition, these bombings served to send a “message to Moscow” and thus make the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) a more tractable diplomatic partner. Then it followed that the US monopoly and later weapon superiority would function as a deterrent to Soviet strategies of expansion. In due course, however, the Soviets acquired their own nuclear capabilities such that the next half-century became a period of mutual deterrence, keeping the bipolar rivalry, one of proxy wars and recurrent probes, and thus producing a Cold War standoff while avoiding World War III. And out of that stand-off came the eventual collapse of the Soviet empire, the end of the Cold War, and the emergence of what became a US global hegemony in the 1990s.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information