The Politics of Climate Change Negotiations

The Politics of Climate Change Negotiations

Strategies and Variables in Prolonged International Negotiations

New Horizons in Environmental Politics series

Christian Downie

The Politics of Climate Change Negotiations describes the successes and failures of long international negotiations and most importantly, examines the lessons they hold for the future.

Chapter 6: Discussion: the behaviour of the US and the EU in the international climate change negotiations

Christian Downie

Subjects: environment, climate change, environmental politics and policy, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy, international relations

Extract

The first international negotiation I attended was during 2008 in Bonn, sparking my interest in what lay behind the behaviour of states. Why did they sometimes choose to cooperate and at other times choose to obstruct progress? As I showed in Chapter 2, many scholars have explored such questions and developed theories to explain state behaviour. For example, the two-level intergovernmental perspective, developed by Robert Putnam, relaxed the assumption of the unitary state to emphasize the role that state and non-state actors operating within national processes have on government decisions. In contrast, the transnational perspective focussed on the cross-boundary activities of these actors, whereas the international regime perspective highlighted the pathways by which regimes can affect the behaviour of states. However, as I began to look across the years and decades of the international climate negotiations I was puzzled by the variations in state behaviour, like those of the US and the EU. As I have discussed in the preceding chapters, during the Kyoto phase of the negotiations the positions of both these parties, and the type of agreement that they were prepared to sign, changed. In 1995 the US and EU agreed to the Berlin Mandate, which stipulated no binding emissions targets and timetables for developed countries, no new commitments for developing countries and no flexibility mechanisms. Then in 1997, the US and the EU agreed to the Kyoto Protocol, which included binding emissions targets and timetables for developed countries and flexibility mechanisms.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information