Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law

Research Handbook on Jurisdiction and Immunities in International Law

Research Handbooks in International Law series

Edited by Alexander Orakhelashvili

This Research Handbook provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the international law of jurisdiction and immunities, illustrating those aspects in which the law of jurisdiction and law of immunities are mutually interdependent, as well as shedding light on the implications of that interdependence. With authoritative contributions from recognized experts, it offers an impartial perspective on the applicable international law, independent from any positions held in governmental or other institutional circles.

Chapter 8: The UK State Immunity Act 1978: history, scope and relation to international law

Alexander Orakhelashvili

Subjects: law - academic, public international law


Ordinarily, the national courts’ practice can be seen as part of state practice in terms of the formation of customary international law on the relevant matter of public international law. However, the terms of reference to be used by national courts may be determinative of the actual extent to which their jurisprudence will contribute to that state practice. To illustrate, at times, the cases decided by English and US courts on the basis of national legislation on state immunity, such as the State Immunity Act (SIA) 1978 in the United Kingdom and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) 1976 in the United States, are prevented from applying the restrictive doctrine on state immunity, because the latter doctrine, as embodied in the common law that incorporates international law, has been displaced, in relation to those national jurisdictions, by the statute that prescribes that a general immunity persists unless a specific exception from it is identified. The practice of national courts that applies a national statute conflicting with the pre-existing common law, and thus with international law, has far lesser potential to contribute to state practice in terms of the creation of customary rules of international law. What options are available to English courts for dealing with the above dilemma, and to what extent are they supposed to take part in resolving it? According to F.A. Mann, the SIA 1978 is a remedial statute, given that it makes a ‘new provision’ on the issues of state immunity in the UK legal system.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information