New Global Economic Architecture

New Global Economic Architecture

The Asian Perspective

ADBI series on Asian Economic Integration and Cooperation

Edited by Masahiro Kawai, Peter J. Morgan and Pradumna B. Rana

The global financial crisis of 2007-2009 exposed flaws and shortcomings in the global economic architecture, and has sparked an international debate about possible remedies for them. The postwar global architecture was essentially guided by the major developed economies, and was centered around the IMF, the GATT – the predecessor of the WTO – and the World Bank. Today, however, the balance of economic and financial power is shifting toward the emerging economies, especially those in Asia, and both global governance and economic policy thinking are beginning to reflect this shift. This book addresses the important question of how a regional architecture, particularly one in Asia, can induce a supply of regional public goods that can complement and strengthen the global public goods supplied through the global architecture. These public goods include institutions to help maintain financial stability, support more open trading regimes and promote sustainable economic development.

Chapter 4: Enhancing the effectiveness of CMIM and AMRO: challenges and tasks

Reza Siregar and Akkharaphol Chabchitrchaidol

Subjects: asian studies, asian economics, economics and finance, asian economics, financial economics and regulation


Recent crises, particularly the sovereign debt crisis in the euro area economies, have provided momentum to greater regional financial cooperation in the region. This is particularly evident among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)+3 economies. Through the establishment of the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM) and the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) in March 2010 and May 2011, respectively, substantial headway has been made in this regard. Despite the advance of regional cooperation among the ASEAN+3 economies, a series of fundamental questions have been raised, above all about the size of the CMIM facility. Although the CMIM was doubled in size to US$240 billion with effect from May 2012, the amount has frequently been criticized as insufficient. The European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) of 750 billion euros in 2011, for instance, amounted to about 8 per cent of the total gross domestic product (GDP) of the euro area, while the CMIM amounted to only about 1.5 per cent of the total GDP of the ASEAN+3 economies. The question, therefore, is whether the CMIM can be an effective and relevant part of regional financial cooperation given its limited financial resources. Another fundamental issue is the role of the CMIM and its relation to other available facilities, including bilateral swap lines, as well as global facilities – most notably those provided by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information