New Global Economic Architecture

New Global Economic Architecture

The Asian Perspective

ADBI series on Asian Economic Integration and Cooperation

Edited by Masahiro Kawai, Peter J. Morgan and Pradumna B. Rana

The global financial crisis of 2007-2009 exposed flaws and shortcomings in the global economic architecture, and has sparked an international debate about possible remedies for them. The postwar global architecture was essentially guided by the major developed economies, and was centered around the IMF, the GATT – the predecessor of the WTO – and the World Bank. Today, however, the balance of economic and financial power is shifting toward the emerging economies, especially those in Asia, and both global governance and economic policy thinking are beginning to reflect this shift. This book addresses the important question of how a regional architecture, particularly one in Asia, can induce a supply of regional public goods that can complement and strengthen the global public goods supplied through the global architecture. These public goods include institutions to help maintain financial stability, support more open trading regimes and promote sustainable economic development.

Chapter 5: Financial safety nets in Asia: genesis, evolution, adequacy and way forward

Hal Hill and Jayant Menon

Subjects: asian studies, asian economics, economics and finance, asian economics, financial economics and regulation


The impetus for strengthening regional financial safety nets among Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries came following the Asian Financial Crisis (AFC) of 1997–98, when the existing insurance mechanism in the form of the ASEAN Swap Arrangement (ASA) proved miserably inadequate. Forced to turn to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for the massive bailouts required, and the resentment that ensued following the bitter medicine prescribed, a decision was taken to pursue a regional safety net that could provide a real alternative. The initial step was taken with the creation of the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI) in 2000, which expanded the bilateral swaps of the ASA both in size and membership to include the People’s Republic of China (PRC), Japan and the Republic of Korea. The CMI’s first test came in September 2008 when, following the Lehman Brothers’ collapse, short-term capital quickly exited emerging economies. However, members of the CMI that required liquidity support did not turn to it but instead rushed to secure bilateral swaps with the United States (US), the PRC, Japan, Australia and the multilaterals. Once again, the regional financial safety net had failed its members. This brought about another significant change when in 2009, the CMI was multilateralized to become the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM), with the many swap lines now governed by a single agreement.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information