Table of Contents

Legal Innovations in Asia

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Studies in Comparative Law and Legal Culture series

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.

Chapter 2.1: Comparison of law, transfer of legal concepts, and creation of a legal design: The case of Japan

Harald Baum

Subjects: law - academic, asian law, comparative law


Some may find it surprising to realize that the modern civil laws of Japan – and in turn, those of Korea and Taiwan – are to a significant degree shaped by rules, to cite a provocative phrase by William Ewald, “… that were first struck upon by a leisured class of slave-holding Italian aristocrats – men who pursued law as a hobby, and who have been dead for nearly two thousand years.” The enduring persistence of Roman legal concepts, their long journey through time, and their crossing of national borders and even continents are indeed remarkable. But then “… [Roman law] constitutes, in its ensemble, such a high level of cultural achievement that it will always retain its character as a model for the rational solution of legal conflicts.” A society’s reception of foreign laws can have different triggers. A foreign legal order may be forced upon a country as a consequence of military occupation and ensuing colonization. Or jurists may adapt a specific law simply because of its high prestige and superior quality that competing legal regimes lack at a given point in time. On the other hand, reception may be based on a comprehensive comparison of law that leads to the choice of selected legal rules, possibly in the form of a new bundling of varying rules of different origins into a new code. This latter case is different from the first two because comparative law obviously plays a crucial role in shaping the legal innovation for the adopting state.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information