Table of Contents

Legal Innovations in Asia

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Studies in Comparative Law and Legal Culture series

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.

Chapter 3.6: Limitations on the termination of fixed-term employment contracts: Judicially created rules and their codification in Japanese law

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Subjects: law - academic, asian law, comparative law


With a focus on instances of judicially created norms, this chapter will analyze the limitations on an employer’s right to refuse the renewal of fixed-term employment contracts under Japanese labor law. Part II will provide an overview of the legal status of fixed-term employment contracts and will identify problems with statutory law before the amendments to the Labor Contract Act in 2012. Additionally, Part II will provide a comparative analysis of Japanese law with regards to fixed-term employment contracts. Part III of this chapter will describe case law that effectively restricted an employer’s right to refuse the renewal of employment contracts under certain circumstances. Part IV will then examine new provisions of the Labor Contract Act, which codifies existing case law, point out its significance and examine remaining issues with respect to changes in Japan’s labor market that influenced the amendment. To conclude, Part V will highlight the significance of judicially created legal norms regarding the limitations on an employer’s right to refuse the renewal of fixed-term employment contracts. According to a basic principle of contract law, pacta sunt servanda, the parties to a fixed-term employment contract must maintain contractual relationships until the expiration of the contract. Therefore, unless there is a compelling reason for an exception, neither party may terminate the contract before the end of the contract period.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information