Table of Contents

Legal Innovations in Asia

Legal Innovations in Asia

Judicial Lawmaking and the Influence of Comparative Law

Studies in Comparative Law and Legal Culture series

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Legal Innovations in Asia explores how law in Asia has developed over time as a result of judicial interpretation and innovations drawn from the legal systems of foreign countries. Expert scholars from around the world offer a history of law in the region while also providing a wider context for present-day Asian law. The contributors share insightful perspectives on comparative law, the role of courts, legal transplants, intellectual property, Islamic law and other issues as they relate to the practice and study of law in Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea and Southeast Asia.

Chapter 5.2: Ethics rather than rights: Reconsidering “transmit rather than create” – Toward a new understanding of Korea’s intellectual property rights tradition

Edited by John O. Haley and Toshiko Takenaka

Subjects: law - academic, asian law, comparative law


From a Western perspective, Korea, similar to China, has been thought to inadequately protect intellectual property, and there has been ongoing friction regarding intellectual property trade relations. For a considerable time, Korea was annually listed on the United States Trade Representative (USTR)’s Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Rights Watch List or Priority Watch List. During the negotiation of the Korea–US Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA), which was ratified by the Congress of the United States on October 12, 2011, and by the National Assembly of Korea on November 22, 2011, there was substantial disagreement regarding the scope of protection that should be afforded to intellectual property rights. Professor William P. Alford of Harvard Law School examined the low level of protection afforded to intellectual property rights in China and Taiwan, finding the cause in the countries’ common Confucian background. Alford’s study, which has been considered a potent theory on the topic, argues that China’s traditional focus on the interaction with past orthodoxy rather than originality led to a belief that knowledge should be held communally and thus was the reason an intellectual property system did not develop. A Western scholar’s assessment from a Confucian perspective is original and quite convincing. Because Korean culture is similarly deeply rooted in Confucianism, Alford’s theory may be applied to Korea as well. However, as 20 years have passed since the publication of Alford’s theory, it is questionable whether the Western view of intellectual property rights in the Eastern world is correct as applied to Korea.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information