Chapter 11: Public–private partnerships in the rail sector
Over the past 25 years, 27 public–private partnerships (PPPs) have been awarded in the rail sector. However, rail PPPs are controversial. Some argue that they make it possible to fund and build projects that would otherwise have been impossible to launch, or that they foster innovative systems, while others think that PPPs are a way to bypass budget constraints that ultimately cost more for the taxpayer. The objective of this chapter is to conduct the first comprehensive review of all PPPs in heavy rail in order to reach conclusions on the conditions of success of rail PPPs, based on quantitative evidence. More precisely, we will focus on three specific questions: What are the common features and differences among rail PPPs, and how did they evolve in the last two decades? What are the specific features of rail PPPs compared to other PPPs? Why do so many PPPs fail and need public support, especially among traffic-based concessions? In this chapter, we restrict our analysis to PPPs in the rail sector that include significant investment by concessionaires. We thus exclude other modes of public transportation, such as light rail, metro and people movers, as well as a wide variety of other kinds of public–private arrangements such as operating concessions, divestitures, joint ventures, private infrastructure, etc.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.