Table of Contents

Handbook of Research methods and Applications in Environmental Studies

Handbook of Research methods and Applications in Environmental Studies

Handbooks of Research Methods and Applications series

Edited by Matthias Ruth

This volume presents methods to advance the understanding of interdependencies between the well-being of human societies and the performance of their biophysical environment. It showcases applications to material and energy use; urbanization and technological transition; economic growth and social vulnerabilities; development and governance of social and industrial networks; the role of history, culture, and science itself in carrying out analysis and guiding policy; as well as the role of theory, data, and models in guiding decisions.

Chapter 15: Using participatory system dynamics in environmental and sustainability dialogues

Paula Antunes, Krystyna Stave, Nuno Videira and Rui Santos

Subjects: environment, research methods in the environment, geography, research methods in geography, research methods, research methods in the environment

Extract

Decision-making processes regarding environmental management and sustainable development issues require the consideration of interactions between ecological, economic and social aspects. The ecological and social systems involved are complex and dynamic, and the effects of changes in one part of the system on other parts are often uncertain and difficult to anticipate (Stave 2010). Whether evaluating the environmental impacts of a specific project, designing a policy to tackle an environmental problem or developing and analyzing sustainability pathways, connections between management actions and future consequences are often nonlinear, counterintuitive and uncertain. Furthermore, decisions generally affect multiple stakeholders who often have different values, different views about the world and disagree about the problem formulation, management goals and decision criteria. Environmental and sustainability problems are therefore typically complex, uncertain, multi-scale and affect multiple actors and agencies. In a context of scientific uncertainty, experts are seen as no better equipped to decide on questions of values, interests, or acceptable levels of risk than any other group of citizens (Funtowicz and Ravetz 1990; Holmes and Scoones 2000).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information