Leaks, Whistleblowing and the Public Interest

Leaks, Whistleblowing and the Public Interest

The Law of Unauthorised Disclosures

Ashley Savage

This book is the first of its kind to provide an in-depth treatment of the law of unauthorised disclosures in the United Kingdom. Drawing upon extensive data obtained using freedom of information as a methodology and examples from comparative jurisdictions, the book considers the position of civil servants, employees of the security and intelligence services and service personnel in the armed forces. It considers the protections available, the consequences of leaking and a full assessment of the authorised alternatives.

Chapter 4: Legal protections for raising concerns

Ashley Savage

Subjects: business and management, human resource management, law - academic, corporate law and governance, corruption and economic crime, labour, employment law, politics and public policy, public policy


Whistleblowers in the United Kingdom enjoy the protection of the Public Interest Disclosure Act (PIDA) 1998. Despite being heralded as ‘model in this field of legislation as far as Europe is concerned’, the Act has since faced mounting criticism from groups such as Whistleblowers UK, a non-profit organisation offering support to whistleblowers. Part of the difficulty is that the Act only provides protection ‘post-detriment’ or ‘post-dismissal’, thus requiring workers to bring a claim after mistreatment. PIDA 1998 does not require workers to exhaust internal procedures before choosing to go outside of their organisation. Organisations are under no obligation to follow a baseline standard of procedures in handling whistleblowing concerns, in fact they need not provide any whistleblowing procedures at all. The absence of procedural hurdles for workers has allowed UK whistleblowers greater flexibility in how they may raise concerns and to whom. However, this flexibility, combined with the absence of agreed base-line standards, has inevitably led to a myriad of different approaches between organisations. If things go wrong, claimants, at times unaided, must make a claim before an employment tribunal. PIDA 1998 can require claimants to mount often complex legal arguments without having the requisite expertise to do so. The whistleblowing charity, Public Concern at Work, established a Commission which suggested a number of reforms to PIDA 1998. The National Audit Office have published reports on the handling of concerns by regulators and the whistleblowing policies and arrangements available to civil servants.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information