Cities and Private Planning

Cities and Private Planning

Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs

Edited by David Emanuel Andersson and Stefano Moroni

Through comprehensive case studies of privately planned cities and neighbourhood in Asia, Europe and North America, this book characterizes the theoretical basis and empirical manifestations of private urban planning. In this innovative volume, Andersson and Moroni develop an understudied aspect of urban planning and re-evaluate conceptions of our urban future.

Chapter 13: The challenge of regulating private planning initiatives

Nurit Alfasi and Talia Margalit

Subjects: economics and finance, austrian economics, institutional economics, urban economics, urban and regional studies, cities, urban economics, urban studies

Extract

Private planning initiatives produce an essential part of the built environment, and greatly impact the ever-changing spirit of cities and the urban mass. While such initiatives ultimately represent specific private interests, modern planning legitimacy rests on the idea that administrative interventions are essential for preserving wider public interests (Campbell and Marshall, 2002; Grant, 2005). Thus, in most countries, the public is represented by planning administrations embedded in local and central government. Such administrations are commissioned to define and protect the public interest, guide planning thought and evaluate private planning initiatives. As planning administrations are part of the public service, they are expected to represent the public and safeguard its essential interests. The definition of ‘the public’ in the urban sphere has changed substantially in the past decades, as national governments relinquished many public responsibilities previously taken by the welfare state. As municipalities took more public roles, they exhibited greater decision-making, financing and entrepreneurial activity for the public benefit (Fainstein 1991, 2000; Sassen, 1994; Jessop and Sum, 2000; Brenner and Theodore, 2005). Growing theoretical attention to urban politics was due to the creation of new frameworks for evaluating the performance of local governments and understanding municipal dynamics. Based on case studies of US cities–in particular Atlanta, Georgia (Stone, 1989) and Dallas, Texas (Elkin, 1987)–urban regime theory was articulated, providing a comprehensive look at local politics and the way public and private actors interact to affect urban affairs.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information