Table of Contents

Restructuring Welfare Governance

Restructuring Welfare Governance

Marketization, Managerialism and Welfare State Professionalism

Edited by Tanja Klenk and Emmanuele Pavolini

This innovative book explores the introduction and impact of marketization and managerialism in social policy by adopting a dual perspective, considering both governance and human resources. Welfare governance (e.g. welfare mix, regulation, employment conditions, customer involvement) has changed significantly in the past decade. The editors and contributors collectively assesses these processes not only by comparing different policy fields and countries, but also by taking a close look inside organizations, examining the coping strategies of professionals, and how they adapt to new models of governing welfare organizations.

Chapter 3: Marketization and managerialization of higher education policies in a comparative perspective

Roberto Moscati, Alberto Stanchi, Matteo Turri, Massimiliano Vaira and Emmanuele Pavolini

Subjects: business and management, human resource management, education, management education, politics and public policy, public administration and management, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, welfare states


The comparative analysis of higher education systems (HESs) has been traditionally based on a twofold structural distinction: the role of the state in governing the system and the way in which the systems are structured. The first distinction is drawn from Archer’s dichotomy between centralized and decentralized systems (1979). Centralized systems are characterized by the strong and pervasive role of the state in governing the higher education system. This is achieved through policies, detailed regulations, bureaucratic requirements and formal controls of conformity for all the institutions constituting the HES. Centralized HESs are largely present in European continental countries. The decentralized systems, on the contrary, are characterized by a less invasive role played by the state which provides the system with general framework policies implemented by institutions with a high degree of autonomy, albeit ultimately supervised by the state. Decentralized systems were typically embodied by Great Britain. Between these two ideal-typical polarities, other systems display different degrees of autonomy and centralization (for example the German HES is decentralized at the national-federal level, but centralized at the Land level). Another widely used typology for classifying governance structures of HESs is the well-known Clark’s Triangle (Clark 1983) according to which HESs can be distinguished by the prevalence of state, market, or academic oligarchy as coordination and governance structures.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information