Chapter 9: Control signals and the social policy dimensions of immigration reform
Structural labor shortages, projected demographic shortfalls and an increase in cross-border business activity have prompted many advanced economies to selectively relax controls on economic immigration in recent years. However, expansive immigration policies tend to be unpopular among key voting constituencies, because of perceptions that they pose a challenge to a nation’s cultural unity and territorial integrity, or because they are viewed as potentially eroding employment opportunities and welfare protections of citizens and permanent residents (Boswell 2007: 88–93). Competing economic pressures for looser visa controls and populist pressures for restrictive policies can thus create an economic-political ‘control dilemma’ (Guiraudon and Joppke 2001: 12–13; Guiraudon and Lahav 2000: 187–90). The use of ‘control signals’ has been a government strategy in response to control dilemmas in order to generate sufficient political capital to liberalize work visa regulations (Wright 2014). The capacity of governments to use control signals rests largely on their handling of two issues: immigration control and social policy. The first involves restricting the entry of immigrant groups deemed to be unwanted, such as those seeking asylum or entering under family visas that may impose a burden on the welfare state.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.