Table of Contents

Handbook on Migration and Social Policy

Handbook on Migration and Social Policy

Edited by Gary P. Freeman and Nikola Mirilovic

In this detailed Handbook, an interdisciplinary team of scholars explores the consequences of migration for the social policies of rich welfare states. They test conflicting claims as to the positive and negative effects of different types of migration against the experience of countries in Europe, North America, Australasia, the Middle East and South Asia. The chapters assess arguments as to migration’s impact on the financial, social and political stability of social programs. The volume includes comprehensive reviews of existing scholarship as well as state of the art original empirical analysis.

Chapter 18: Civic integration in Europe: continuity versus discontinuity

Christian Joppke and Tobias Eule

Subjects: politics and public policy, migration, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy, migration, welfare states


This chapter reviews civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. The novelty of the policy seems to be at least twofold. First, integration is no longer left to the free play of society’s institutions, such as the labor market or education, but is subjected to efforts to bring it under conscious, concerted state control. In that respect, civic integration is tantamount to the rise of state-led integration as such, replacing a previous reign of laissez-faire (complemented by mostly local interventions). Second, civic integration combines measures that further the integration of immigrants with their selection and control – in a nutshell, integration and immigration policy are no longer separate domains. However, the claim of novelty and comprehensiveness of the policy have been challenged from at least two angles that will be scrutinized in this chapter: ● There is disagreement about the continuation of national models of integration, or whether the similarities of the policy across states outweigh national variation. Some have argued that civic integration signals the end of national models of integration, while others have argued that nationally distinct approaches to integration continue under new cover. ● There is disagreement about the relationship between national-level and local-level policies. Civic integration is a national-level policy, which (at least rhetorically) marks a sharp departure from previously more gentle-minded, multicultural policies (or non-policies and laissez faire in countries that never had official multiculturalism policies).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information