The South China Sea Disputes and Law of the Sea

The South China Sea Disputes and Law of the Sea

NUS Centre for International Law series

Edited by S. Jayakumar, Tommy Koh and Robert Beckman

South China Sea Disputes And Law Of The Sea explores in great detail the application of specific provisions of UNCLOS and how the framework of international law applies to the South China Sea. Offering a comprehensive analysis of the individual topics and their application to the South China Sea region, each chapter of the book provides a substantive and rigorous investigation into the history, development and application of the relevant legal principles. It is written within the global context so that lessons learned from this exercise will have global implications. Contributors include former judges from ITLOS, legal advisors to States who participated in the negotiation and drafting of UNCLOS, as well as outstanding scholars of both law and geography, many of whom have acted as counsel or experts in cases before international court and tribunals.

Chapter 8: UNCLOS Part XV and the South China Sea

Robert Beckman

Subjects: asian studies, asian law, law - academic, asian law, maritime law, public international law


The fundamental legal dispute in the South China Sea is about which claimant has the better claim to sovereignty over the disputed offshore features. Brunei Darussalam, China, Malaysia, the Philippines and Viet Nam claim some or all of the features in the Spratly Islands; China and the Philippines claim the features in Scarborough Shoal; and China and Viet Nam claim the Paracel Islands. In addition, Taiwan claims the same features as China. The sovereignty disputes over features in the South China Sea are governed by customary international law on the acquisition of territory and not by the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Even if agreement could be reached on which State has the better claim to sovereignty over the disputed islands, many complex legal disputes concerning the ‘maritime claims’ of the claimants would remain. One of the most difficult legal issues that would have to be addressed is how to delimit the maritime boundaries between the offshore islands and the mainland of the bordering States. This is not only a complex legal issue in and of itself, but is also likely to raise other issues concerning the interpretation and application of the provisions of UNCLOS, including whether particular islands are entitled to an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of their own, whether the baselines from which the maritime zones have been measured are lawful, and what is the legal effect of an extended continental shelf claim by one or more of the claimants.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information