Table of Contents

Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance

Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance

Edited by Soonhee Kim, Shena Ashley and Henry W. Lambright

This collection explores the frontiers of knowledge at the intersection of public administration and international relations scholarship. The culturally, generationally and academically diverse team of editors stake a meaningful claim in this burgeoning field by bringing together an international group of top and emerging scholars who think and research at this intersection. The acceleration of global governance arrangements presents a new sphere of public administration beyond the nation-state, and a new set of challenges for national and local governments that have gone unexplored. Public administration scholarship has essentially ignored the thousands of international and transboundary organizations that have become critical to the creation and implementation of global policy. This book highlights a broad range of research topics and approaches to help illustrate the expansive contours of relevant inquiry and to advance research in the field. There is no other collection that considers the broad context of globalizing public administration and the many institutional and governance forms entailed.

Chapter 10: Regulation in crisis: reputation, capacity and limitations

Martin Lodge

Subjects: politics and public policy, public administration and management, public policy


Regulation has been at the frontline of public administration and public policy research throughout the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. It is one of the inherent activities that are associated with government: government classifies, inspects, licenses, prohibits and sanctions. It is therefore not surprising that the field of regulation has witnessed considerable debate. In the world of practice, the debate about regulation has taken on a highly adversarial tone in the United States, where regulation is often accused of being ‘captured’ by dominant interests (Carpenter and Moss, 2014). Whereas for some, therefore, the diagnosis of ‘capture’ justifies the elimination of regulation, for others, ‘capture’ represents the basis for strengthened regulatory procedures and capacities. In the world of research, regulation has also been a matter of considerable attention, ranging from issues relating to accountability and control to those concerned with the insulation of bureaucracy from political processes. These debates are long-standing and have received repeated bursts of interests in light of empirical events, methodological advance, and theoretical agendas. The financial crisis offers a good punctuating episode to question whether the practice and study of regulation require a period of reflection. This chapter argues that, in fact, both the worlds of practice and research are in crisis. By taking a reputation-based perspective on regulatory capacity, this chapter points to the limitations of contemporary agendas, and suggests how an international conversation about regulation can be taken forward.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information