Trusteeship of the Global Commons
New Horizons in Environmental and Energy Law series
Chapter 9: Conclusion: there is another way
Never measure the height of a mountain until you have reached the top. Then you will see how low it was. Dag Hammarskjold. Shifting from states to earth as the centre of environmental governance is not really one of choice, but one of necessity. As long as innovative ideas are exclusively derived from what states are willing to support, no genuine progress will be made. This has been the problem of the United Nations from day one when it began to address the global environmental crisis at the 1972 Stockholm Conference. There has never been enough support for effective institutional reform. States allowed for a United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), but no World Environment Organization; negotiations, but no trusteeship; political declarations, but no binding law; and talk, but no action. The global environmental crisis has been fitted into existing practices and institutional arrangements, rather than the other way round: if existing arrangements are insufficient to meet ecological challenges, they need to be changed.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.