Table of Contents

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Edited by Mel Marquis and Roberto Cisotta

With courts and arbitrators functioning daily as front line decision-makers applying EU competition law, this book reflects on a variety of issues related to the litigation and arbitration of cases in this field. It provides expert analysis from perspectives of substance, procedure, fundamental rights, as well as inter-institutional dialogue and coherence.

Chapter 3: Judicial dialogues and uniformity in the multi-level application of EU competition law

Adelina Adinolfi

Subjects: law - academic, competition and antitrust law, european law, law -professional, competition and antitrust law


This chapter attempts a review regarding enforcement of EU competition law by national courts over the ten years of application of Regulation 1/2003. It seeks to determine whether the mechanisms set up by the Regulation in order to ensure uniformity in judicial enforcement of EU competition law were actually used by national courts, and possibly to ascertain whether they had a real impact in achieving the desired unity of application of antitrust law. The chapter argues that important divergences remain in the judicial enforcement of competition law, largely due to the wide margin of discretion at times conferred on national courts, and due to the differences of national procedural rules. The chapter also briefly considers some of the recent measures and proposals adopted by the Commission for the purpose of harmonizing the legislation of the Member States by which national institutions enforce EU law. When in 1999 the Commission proposed, in its White Paper on the modernization of competition law,to abolish the centralized system for enforcing the Community’s antitrust rules, it was self-evident that the new approach bore the risk of undermining the uniform application of competition law. After all, a centralized mechanism for the enforcement of competition law based fundamentally on the primary role of the Commission, which had applied for nearly 40 years, was undoubtedly the most effective way to attain uniformity.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information