Table of Contents

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Edited by Mel Marquis and Roberto Cisotta

With courts and arbitrators functioning daily as front line decision-makers applying EU competition law, this book reflects on a variety of issues related to the litigation and arbitration of cases in this field. It provides expert analysis from perspectives of substance, procedure, fundamental rights, as well as inter-institutional dialogue and coherence.

Chapter 5: The evolution of the ‘full jurisdiction’ of the Union Courts in Article 101 and 102 matters

Renato Nazzini

Subjects: law - academic, competition and antitrust law, european law, law -professional, competition and antitrust law


This chapter examines the jurisprudence of the Courts of the European Union with a view towards assessing the impact of the KME judgment of the Court of Justice. This judgment upholds the compatibility of the jurisdiction of the Union Courts to review the decisions of the European Commission applying Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and imposing fines for infringements of those provisions with the EU principle of effective judicial protection. The examination demonstrates the evolution of the standard of review in such cases to a standard of correctness. In this regard, it is argued that the standard of correctness is required as regards any issue of fact or law that bears directly on the imposition of, or the calculation of, a fine. The paper also clarifies that the standard of correctness applies where the Union Courts review the Commission’s evaluation of factual evidence, except in matters of complex economic or technical assessment, where a more deferential standard persists. With regard to the more deferential approach in the latter context, it is argued that this vestige of the margin of appreciation concept is contrary to fundamental rights principles given the current institutional configuration. In recent years, it has been controversial whether the standard of judicial review of decisions of the European Commission (‘Commission’) applying Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’)amounts to ‘full jurisdiction’ and is therefore compatible with the EU principle of effective judicial protection.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information