Table of Contents

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law

Edited by Mel Marquis and Roberto Cisotta

With courts and arbitrators functioning daily as front line decision-makers applying EU competition law, this book reflects on a variety of issues related to the litigation and arbitration of cases in this field. It provides expert analysis from perspectives of substance, procedure, fundamental rights, as well as inter-institutional dialogue and coherence.

Chapter 6: Dura lex sed lex: the parent-subsidiary relationship in EU antitrust law and the AEG Telefunken presumption – independence of the EU legal system, effectiveness of competition law and protection of fundamental rights

Lorenzo F. Pace

Subjects: law - academic, competition and antitrust law, european law, law -professional, competition and antitrust law


The increasingly frequent reference to the protection of fundamental rights in the application of EU antitrust law is a trend that has grown significantly in parallel with the reforms brought about by Regulation 1/2003. The application of fundamental rights to antitrust law is explained by several factors, including for example, the increasingly harsh penalties imposed for violations of antitrust law; the tensions that arise from the Commission’s multiple roles; and the introduction of Article 6(2) TEU, as amended by the Lisbon Treaty, and the binding nature of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The greater attention being given to fundamental rights is evident in the development of the application of the AEG Telefunken presumption, whereby a parent company may be penalized for the antitrust infringements of its wholly-owned subsidiary on the ground that the parent and the subsidiary constitute a single economic entity, and hence a single ‘undertaking’. Recently, the Court of Justice has confirmed the lawfulness of that presumption. However, increasing attention is now given to the adequacy of the Commission’s reasoning, particularly when the Commission rejects arguments made by parent companies to rebut the presumption. These developments suggest that the growing importance of fundamental rights protection may under certain conditions temper the principle of the effectiveness of EU competition law. The reform of Regulation 1/2003 has enabled the Commission to focus its enforcement mainly against cartels.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information