Disequilibrium Sports Economics

Disequilibrium Sports Economics

Competitive Imbalance and Budget Constraints

New Horizons in the Economics of Sport series

For decades, sports economics has been set within the framework of equilibrium economics, in particular when modelling team sport leagues. Based on a conviction that this does not reflect real life, this book addresses a gap in the literature and opens up a new research area by applying concepts drawn from disequilibrium economics. It is divided into two parts, the first of which focuses on economic disequilibrium in sports markets and competitive imbalance in sporting contests. The second part concentrates on soft budget constraints and their consequences for club governance and management.

Chapter 7: Governance of professional team sports clubs: agency problem and soft budget constraint

Wladimir Andreff

Subjects: economics and finance, sports


When studying and assessing corporate governance, mainstream economics refers to the principal-agent model in a context where organizations (firms) operate in a competitive market and whose residual claimants maximize their revenues leading to profit maximization. Transferring such analysis to professional team sports leagues and clubs is not straightforward since a league actually does not operate in a genuine competitive market. A league is a monopoly on the supply side of its product market and a monopsony on the demand side of its major input (talent) market; both markets are not purely or even practically competitive. By the same token, tied by the co-production of their games and league rules, clubs behave as members of a cartel and benefit, through league revenue redistribution, from a windfall rent derived from the league monopoly and monopsony positions. Thus, even if teams are assumed to be profit maximizers, like they are supposed to be in closed North American professional team sports leagues, a team’s access to profit is driven by a specific economic environment of monopoly pricing, supply side restriction on quantities and demand side bargaining power that usually guarantee a profit that includes monopoly and monopsony rents, on the one hand. On the other hand, profit maximization is the best hindrance against lasting deficits and debts, and keeps clubs from running under a soft budget constraint.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information