User Generated Law

User Generated Law

Re-Constructing Intellectual Property Law in a Knowledge Society

Edited by Thomas Riis

Engaging and innovative, User Generated Law offers a new perspective on the study of intellectual property law. Shifting research away from the study of statutory law, contributions from leading scholars explore why and how self-regulation of intellectual property rights in a knowledge society emerges and develops. Analysing examples of self-regulation in the intellectual property law based industries, this book evaluates to what extent user generated law is an accurate model for explaining and understanding this process.

Chapter 9: The private legal governance of domain names

Jens Schovsbo

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law


Domain names serve as “human friendly” “mnemonic labels that assist in identifying the locations of resources on the internet”. Although their importance as a means for navigating the Internet has diminished with the development of effective search engines, an effective system for the management of domain names remains crucial for the functioning of the Internet. In spite of their continuing importance, and in spite of burgeoning potential for conflicts concerning trademark rights, the intervention of traditional State-enacted law has been very limited in terms of regulating domain names. National legislators have been almost totally absent from the process and relatively few conflicts have reached national courts considering that a staggering 270+ million domain names are registered. While the traditional means for creating legislation and resolving conflicts have remained peripheral, we have seen the emergence of what has been described as “a cosmopolitan and uniform system of rules that transcends local rules and nation states”. Hence, conflicts involving domain names are being decided by special private tribunals or panels such as the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). These are bodies which have been developed by communities of users within complicated systems of self- and co-regulation such as ICANN (the Internet Cooperation for Assigned Names and Numbers). Such bodies have authorized a number of private institutions (“Providers”) to decide disputes over domain names. Normally, these dispute resolution bodies do not derive their competences from legislation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information