Chapter 5: The promise of saved lives: coroners’ preventive function
In the previous chapter I outlined the argument that the preventive potential of coronial recommendations is undermined when recommendations are not implemented by organisations. This chapter explores coroners’ preventive function in detail and, in particular, the following questions: • Do coroners’ recommendations save lives? • What counts as a “successful” coroner’s recommendation? Is success measured by the number of lives saved and/or evidence of the uptake of recommendations by organisations? • How can we maximise the preventive potential of coroners’ recommendations? NZ coroners have been described as “public health officials” because of their statutory preventive functions. The principal role of coroners is to investigate and determine causes of deaths that occur in sudden, unexpected or unnatural circumstances. This work advances public health indirectly, not least by enhancing the quality of vital statistics and public health surveillance. Some coronial data is shared with other injury and death prevention agencies in NZ and overseas. In some jurisdictions, such as NZ, Australia, Ireland, the UK and most Canadian provinces, coroners are also vested with authority to play a more direct role in advancing public health. As part of their findings, they may issue recommendations aimed at reducing risk and improving health and safety in the community.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.