Table of Contents

Global Regionalisms and Higher Education

Global Regionalisms and Higher Education

Projects, Processes, Politics

Edited by Susan L. Robertson, Kris Olds, Roger Dale and Que Anh Dang

This original book provides a unique analysis of the different regional and inter-regional projects, their processes and the politics of Europeanisation, globalisation and education. Collectively, the contirbutors engage with international relations and integrations theory to explore new ways of thinking about regionalisms and inter-regionalisms, and bring to the fore the role that higher education plays in this.

Chapter 8: Ir-regular regionalism? China’s borderlands and ASEAN higher education: trapped in the prism

Anthony Welch

Subjects: education, education policy, politics and public policy, education policy, social policy and sociology, education policy, urban and regional studies, regional studies

Extract

The fact that China–ASEAN relations are conventionally viewed through the prism of economics and trade is misleading in at least two senses. Firstly, even within the trade portfolio, the emphasis is conventionally on goods, obscuring swiftly rising service sector trade in areas such as finance, tourism and education. Secondly, the emphasis on trade is itself misleading, in that China–ASEAN relations are far richer, of longer duration, and more varied than mere trade relations indicate. In this chapter I will show that China’s southern borderlands, selected as an illustration of wider China–ASEAN regionalism in higher education, reveal a rich and complex tapestry of relations extending over more than a millennium, and that crucially embrace forms of higher learning and knowledge mobility. Six pillars of China–ASEAN relations are sketched below: economics, knowledge mobility, historical background, Chinese regional diaspora, territorial disputes and regional perceptions of Chinese minorities; before turning to a specific focus on China’s southern borderlands region that has long featured close relations with Viet Nam. This might be considered an asymmetric relationship. Yet Chan has argued that, whilst Viet Nam has maintained its independence, China will have to buy its way into Southeast Asia, via Viet Nam (Chan, 2013: 121–122; South China Morning Post, 2015a, 2015b).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information