Table of Contents

Intellectual Property Rights as Foreign Direct Investments

Intellectual Property Rights as Foreign Direct Investments

From Collision to Collaboration

Elgar International Investment Law series

Lukas Vanhonnaeker

This discerning book examines the interface between intellectual property and foreign direct investments to consider one key question: how does the international investment law framework and the international legal regime regulating intellectual property converge? The book scrutinizes circumstances in which and to what extent international investment law’s traditional protective standards apply to intellectual property rights investments and contributes to debate surrounding the fragmentation of international law, arising from its expansion and diversification.

Chapter 7: The fair and equitable treatment standard of protection and intellectual property investments

Lukas Vanhonnaeker

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, international economic law, trade law, international investment law

Extract

The roots of the Fair and Equitable Treatment (FET) standard in the field of international trade can be traced back to the 1948 Havana Charter for an International Trade Organization which, although it never entered into force, provided under Article 11(2) that: The Organization may, in such collaboration with other inter-governmental organizations as may be appropriate: (a) make recommendations for and promote bilateral or multilateral agreements on measures designed: (i) to assure just and equitable treatment for the enterprise, skills, capital, arts and technology brought from one Member country to another; . . . However, in spite of the continuous affirmation of the FET principle in international trade agreements since 1948 and its consecration in ‘[n]early all recent BITs require[ing] that investments and investors covered under the treaty receive “fair and equitable treatment”’, coupled with the fact that the standard ‘has acquired prominence in investment arbitration as a consequence of the fact that other standards traditionally provided by international law might not in the circumstances of each case be entirely appropriate’, the clear meaning of the standard remains to this day uncertain.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information