Table of Contents

How to get Published in the Best Management Journals

How to get Published in the Best Management Journals

Edited by Timothy Clark, Mike Wright and David J. Ketchen Jr.

This much-anticipated book is a comprehensive guide to a successful publishing strategy. Written by top journal editors, it introduces the publishing process, resolves practical issues, encourages the right methods and offers tips for navigating the review process, understanding journals and publishing across disciplinary boundaries. As if that weren’t enough it includes key contributions on open access, publishing ethics, making use of peer review, special issues, sustaining a publications career, journal rankings and increasing your odds of publishing success. This will be a must read for anyone seeking to publish in top journals.

Chapter 18: Challenging the gods: circumstances justifying the protest of a journal rejection decision

Gerald R. Ferris

Subjects: business and management, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, international business, marketing, organisational behaviour, research methods in business and management, strategic management


Young scholars, new to the organizational sciences field, learn early on about the process through which their research gets published in scientific journals. It is called the “peer review process,” it has been in operation for decades, and it is used in virtually all academic disciplines. Essentially, the publication fate of scholars’ work typically rests at the hands of an associate editor and several anonymous reviewers, who presumably are knowledgeable about the subject matter of the scholars’ work. It is their collective judgments about the quality of the work being reviewed, and perhaps its subsequent revisions, that determine whether the research is published in the journal or rejected. Therefore, it is fair to state that the field grants great deference to the evaluations of research by these “gatekeepers” in the peer review process. So, given this process, and the esteem it is granted by the field, it might seem quite inappropriate to question or challenge/protest a decision to reject your paper. Indeed, I would agree that, in most cases, scholars need to accept the outcome of the peer review process concerning their research paper they submitted for review – whatever that decision might be. However, I am arguing in this article that there are situations or circumstances that arise where it is legitimate to challenge or protest a rejection decision by a journal editor or associate editor.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information