Table of Contents

Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism

Constitutionalism Across Borders in the Struggle Against Terrorism

Edited by Federico Fabbrini and Vicki C. Jackson

This edited collection explores the topic of constitutionalism across borders in the struggle against terrorism, analyzing how constitutional rules and principles relevant in the field of counter-terrorism move across borders. What emerges is a picture of the complex interplay of constitutional law, international law, criminal law and the law of war, creating webs of norms and regulations that apply in the struggle against terrorism conducted across increasingly porous borders.

Chapter 12: Detention at sea: the persistence of territorial constraints on constitutional rights

Jonathan Hafetz

Subjects: law - academic, constitutional and administrative law, terrorism and security law, politics and public policy, constitutions


The extension of constitutional protections overseas remains a subject of controversy in U.S. counter-terrorism law and policy. During the first years of the war on terrorism, the U.S. government stressed limitations on the Constitution’s extraterritorial application to avoid legal constraints. The linkage of rights and territorial sovereignty, coupled with U.S. citizenship, helped provide the rationale for the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, secret CIA prisons, and the associated practices of rendition and torture. In Boumediene v. Bush, the U.S. Supreme Court eventually rejected an absolutist approach to the Constitution’s extraterritorial application. The U.S. has also increasingly pivoted away from grounding detention policy on territorial considerations, as illustrated by the Obama administration’s pledge to close the prison at Guantanamo and apply uniform standards to the treatment of all detainees in U.S. custody, regardless of location. Yet, territorial-based limitations on constitutional rights remain. They persist not only in litigation involving the remaining prisoners at Guantanamo, but also in the Obama administration’s recent practice of holding some terrorism suspects on U.S. ships before transferring them to the United States for criminal prosecution. This chapter examines this new model of ship-based detention through the prism of the extraterritorial application of constitutional rights under U.S. law. International law might regard a U.S. naval ship as an extension of U.S. territory under the traditional flagship rule.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information