Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers, Forest Conservation and Climate Change

Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers, Forest Conservation and Climate Change

Silvia Irawan and Luca Tacconi

Intergovernmental fiscal transfers (IFTs) are an innovative way to create incentives for local public actors to support conservation. This book contributes to the debate about how to conserve tropical forests by implementing mechanisms for reducing deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). With Indonesia as a case study, the authors adopt an interdisciplinary approach, drawing on political science, economics, and public policy. They consider the theoretical justification, as well as the wider political and administrative context for developing the design of IFTs for conservation.

Chapter 3: The cases of Riau and Papua provinces

Silvia Irawan and Luca Tacconi

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, environment, climate change, ecological economics, environmental politics and policy, politics and public policy, environmental governance and regulation

Extract

Indonesia provides an interesting example of the implementation of intergovernmental fiscal transfers for conservation. Following decentralisation in 2002, district governments now have the authority to provide basic public services. The Regional Autonomy Laws do not specifically regulate the forestry sector, and Santoso (2008) argued that, according to Law 32/2004, the forestry sector is not a mandatory affair or a minimum public service to be performed by local governments. This means that local governments can choose whether to partake in the forestry sector to increase the welfare of the people within their jurisdictions. According to the latest Regional Autonomy Law 23/2014, the power to manage forests is mainly distributed between the national and provincial governments. However, as we will discuss below, district governments still have an important role in decision-making processes concerning the exploitation of natural resources. To achieve the objective of this book, two case studies – Riau and Papua provinces – were selected to inform the design of the IFT for conservation. They were chosen on the basis of the following factors: (i) local governments’ commitment to, and interest in, conservation (or reducing deforestation); (ii) fiscal capacity; and (iii) special autonomy status. Riau has the highest deforestation rate in Indonesia, while Papua currently has one of the lowest rates of deforestation in the country. Riau is one of the richest provinces in Indonesia as it is one of very few oil-and gas-producing provinces.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information