Informed Insurance Choice?

Informed Insurance Choice?

The Insurer’s Pre-Contractual Information Duties in General Consumer Insurance

Leander D. Loacker

The direction and clarity of the author's argument is commendably clear. Thus it is clear at the outset that he is mainly concerned with pre-contractual information duties as they affect consumers, and thus standard form contracts—although, he argues, individualised information duties, will have a significantly more important part to play in the future, and he gives some consideration to these.

PART III: Legal basis for and scope of insurer’s pre-contractual information duties

Leander D. Loacker

Subjects: law - academic, commercial law, consumer law, finance and banking law, insurance law, law of obligations


Today’s autonomous English law – unlike most continental jurisdictions – does not have a general principle of good faith. For this reason, contracting parties generally do not owe a duty to disclose material facts to each other, regardless of how dishonest such a nondisclosure may be in the individual case. Instead, it is at first deemed sufficient that parties avoid making misrepresentations. The term ‘good faith’ can however, also be found in English legislation in particular due to requirements of European law. Yet, in addition to the doctrine of misrepresentation, English law features a whole series of other specific solutions like undue influence and equitable estoppel, but also several restrictions on the exercise of rights founded in the law of remedies, all of which together may lead to results comparable to those reached in legal systems which are characterised by an overriding principle of good faith. Moreover, there are several statutory provisions which – contrary to the principle of caveat emptor – require the disclosure of certain information. And finally, exceptions from the basic assumption that ‘[a] duty to negotiate in good faith is unworkable in practice’ are recognised in particular for fiduciary relationships and for so-called contracts uberrimae fidei of which insurance contracts are doubtlessly ‘prime examples’. Within the scope of these ‘contracts of the utmost good faith’, the contracting parties owe each other the duty to disclose any information which is material to the contract. This of course clearly extends beyond the mere avoidance of misrepresentations.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information