Monopolies and Underdevelopment

Monopolies and Underdevelopment

From Colonial Past to Global Reality

New Horizons in Competition Law and Economics series

Calixto Salomão Filho

This ambitious analysis is centered on the evolution of economic structures in colonized economies, showing the effects of these structures on today’s global reality for all economies, whether they are considered ‘developed’ or ‘underdeveloped.’ The result is an illuminating study of historical restriction and exploitation and its impact on present day markets around the world.

Chapter 4: Colonial monopoly and underdevelopment

Calixto Salomão Filho

Subjects: development studies, law and development, economics and finance, development economics, economic psychology, industrial organisation, law - academic, competition and antitrust law, law and development

Extract

This section (Part 2, Chapters 4 and 5) has clear purposes and assumed ambitions. It seeks to identify key characteristics of the economies of underdeveloped countries based on the study of their economic history and certain constitutive structures that have been historically established there. The idea is to identify in this economic history hallmarks that demonstrate the little use of existing economic theories on economic development, whether or not based on economic history, but that have (so-called) developed countries as the model for analysis and observation. What is being said here is simple and not new. The transplant and especially the modelling of developmental processes from the experience of (once) developed economies are not only theoretically erroneous but also lack empirical support. As we intend to demonstrate with theoretical reflections and empirical data, the economic history of these countries presents particular challenges and creates specific structures that require different understanding and treatment. Not only that. As mentioned above,the concept of ‘developed countries’ can also be challenged nowadays based on economic history and the analysis of economic and social structures. The term structure must be made clear. It is intuitive to relate it to the famous structuralist movements of the 1950s and 1960s, especially in Latin America. The methodological connection undoubtedly exists, but is rather limited, as it must co-exist with fundamental differences in substance and content.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information