Table of Contents

The Global Financial Crisis and its Budget Impacts in OECD Nations

The Global Financial Crisis and its Budget Impacts in OECD Nations

Fiscal Responses and Future Challenges

Edited by John Wanna, Evert A. Lindquist and Jouke de Vries

The global financial crisis of 2007–09 constituted the biggest shock to the economies of the OECD nations since the Second World War and caused most of their governments to move into intense crisis mode. They made significant adjustments to their fiscal policy regimes, including massive interventions to stabilize markets and economies. But how they reacted to the crisis, and what measures they took to deal with it, still underpin their economic and budgetary positions. This singular shock provides the editors and authors of this book with an intriguing opportunity to examine how different OECD budgetary systems performed. Chapters cover the EU, North America and Asia, assessing how governments responded to the challenge and how their budget systems evolved in the aftermath.

Chapter 7: The global financial crisis in Denmark and Sweden: a case of crisis management ‘lite’

Lotte Jensen and Sysser Davidsen

Subjects: economics and finance, public finance, public sector economics


From a comparative global perspective, the two neighboring Scandinavian countries, Denmark and Sweden, share the fate of being among the countries least affected by the global financial crisis (GFC) (Finansministeriet 2011b). Gifted by sound public finances prior to the crisis, both countries were in a position to stimulate their economies after the outbreak in the autumn of 2008. However, partly due to diverging histories and institutional features, differences remain on two key dimensions. Firstly, with regard to fiscal performance, Swedish public finances were hardly affected by the crisis and soon re-bounded, whereas in Denmark the deficit eventually exceeded the 3 percent limit set by the European Monetary Union (EMU) and so activated the excessive deficit procedure over 2011–13. Whilst the Swedish debt to gross domestic product (GDP) ratio began to decline after peaking in 2009, the Danish debt continued to increase. Secondly, considering institutional preparedness, the cornerstones of the Danish budgetary framework have remained untouched since the 1980s; whilst Sweden enshrined in law a rather textbook-oriented top-down budgetary and fiscal framework in midst of a previously severe economic crisis in the mid-1990s. The GFC was not used as a window of opportunity for institutional reform in the Swedish case; whereas in Denmark it did provide an opportunity for launching not only structural labor market reforms that had stalled amid party politicking for years, but also institutional reforms of the budgetary framework – with heavy reference to Sweden.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information