Should Britain Leave the EU?

Should Britain Leave the EU?

An Economic Analysis of a Troubled Relationship, Second Edition

Patrick Minford, Sakshi Gupta, Vo P.M. Le, Vidya Mahambare and Yongdeng Xu

This second edition brings up to date a thorough review of all economic aspects of the UK's relationship with the EU, which also puts it in the political context of the upcoming referendum. It notes the intention of the EU to move to 'ever closer union' and the nature of the regulatory and general economic philosophy of the dominant countries of the EU whose writ is enforced by qualified majority voting. The book highlights the UK dilemma that, while extending free markets to its local region is attractive, this philosophy and intended union are substantially at odds with the UK's traditions of free markets and freedom under the common law. BOOK LAUNCH:

Chapter 2: The costs of EU regulation

Patrick Minford, Sakshi Gupta, Vo P.M. Le, Vidya Mahambare and Yongdeng Xu

Subjects: economics and finance, international economics, political economy, politics and public policy, european politics and policy, political economy, regulation and governance


The power of the EU to regulate product and labour markets comes from the Single Market arrangement of the mid-1980s. This gave powers to the Commission, with the agreement of the EU governing council of member states under Qualified Majority Voting, to issue directives in these matters. The greatest irony about this arrangement is that it was forced through the EU by a coalition of the UK and Germany; Mrs Thatcher’s UK government of the time was particularly enthusiastic about what it saw as a spreading of competition across all EU markets; Jacques Delors, the EU Commission President, used this enthusiasm cleverly to get the measure through against much socialist resistance from other countries. The UK government was naive in thinking the measure would work to spread competition. What we now know is that M. Delors promised the resisting governments a socialist arrangement to ‘compensate’ for the pressures from the Single Market. No sooner was the Single Market adopted than he announced the creation of a Social Chapter of the Treaties that would ensure the Single Market satisfied social objectives. While the UK negotiated an opt-out from the Social Chapter, outraged at what it saw as a betrayal of the Single Market vision, in due course Tony Blair’s Labour government of 1997 gave away this opt-out, apparently in a bid to promote an image of the UK as ‘pro-European’, though also tacitly agreeing with much of the social agenda.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information