Table of Contents

Comparing the Democratic Governance of Police Intelligence

Comparing the Democratic Governance of Police Intelligence

New Models of Participation and Expertise in the United States and Europe

Edited by Thierry Delpeuch and Jacqueline E. Ross

"Intelligence-led policing" is an emerging movement of efforts to develop a more democratic approach to the governance of intelligence by expanding the types of expertise and the range of participants who collaborate in the networked governance of intelligence. This book examines how the partnership paradigm has transformed the ways in which participants gather, analyze, and use intelligence about security problems ranging from petty nuisances and violent crime to urban riots, organized crime, and terrorism. It explores changes in the way police and other security professionals define and prioritize these concerns and how the expanding range of stakeholders and the growing repertoire of solutions has transformed both the expertise and the deliberative processes involved.

Chapter 3: The joint production of intelligence in local security partnerships: French initiatives in local risk management

Thierry Delpeuch, Renaud Epstein and Jacqueline E. Ross

Subjects: law - academic, comparative law, criminal law and justice, law and society, terrorism and security law, politics and public policy, terrorism and security


Since the late 1980s, French studies have identified major trends in local security management, particularly the increasing decentralization of public institutions active in the field of security through greater delegation of security powers to mayors, city councils, regional township associations and local security partnerships and through efforts to expand the range of preventive responses to an increasingly differentiated set of concerns about crime and social dysfunction (see Delpeuch 2005; Roché 2004, 2005; Mucchielli and Robert 2002; Froment et al. 2003; Mouhanna and Ferret 2005; Cartuyvels and Mary 1999; Le Goff 2008). An influential paradigm of ‘local security governance’ emphasizes the proliferation of specialized institutions at the municipal level and the importance of negotiating and coordinating solutions among a heterogeneous set of public and private actors (Maillard and Roché 2005). At the same time, however, relatively little attention has been paid to the role that the pursuit and analysis of intelligence plays in local security partnerships, that is, to the ways in which diverse local actors obtain and share information or use that information to diagnose and develop coherent approaches to the security concerns that bring them together. A notable exception to the dearth of scholarship in this area is the pioneering work of Dominique Monjardet, whose studies showed the extent to which police work requires street-level actors to adapt to local terrain, understand local conditions, and establish a close rapport with other institutional actors and with the local population (Monjardet 1996; Jobard 2000).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information