Facts and Norms in Law

Facts and Norms in Law

Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method

Edited by Sanne Taekema, Bart van Klink and Wouter de Been

Facts and Norms in Law: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method presents an innovative collection of essays on the relationship between descriptive and normative elements in legal inquiry and legal practice. What role does empirical data play in law? New insights in philosophy, the social sciences and the humanities have forced the relationship between facts and norms on to the agenda, especially for legal scholars doing interdisciplinary work. This timely volume carefully combines critical perspectives from a range of different disciplinary traditions and theoretical positions.

Chapter 8: A law and economics perspective on normative analysis

Alessio M. Pacces

Subjects: law - academic, legal philosophy, legal theory, research methods in law


The goal of this chapter is to determine whether law and economics can be normative, namely inform policymakers about which legal rules are desirable for society. A review of the law and economics movement reveals three challenges. First, efficiency is not always sufficient to choose among legal rules (the efficiency vs. equity problem). Second, the knowledge of the effects of legal rules may be too limited to achieve efficiency (the policy problem). Third, the incentives underlying lawmaking may undermine the quest for efficiency (the political economy problem). It is argued that these challenges can be overcome if law and economics asks the right questions. Law and economics should be concerned with questions that can be answered based on efficiency as measurable outcome. The quest for rules supporting economic growth is one such question. A focus on economic growth can arguably temper the conflict between efficiency and equity of law, thanks to the magnitude of resources that growth makes potentially available for redistribution and other socially valuable goals. Moreover, economic growth can be measured by objective indicators, implying that both a commitment to policies and their impact can be tested. Measurability of policy outcomes allows disciplining theorists, with respect to the means to achieve certain ends, and policymakers, with respect to the ends underlying the choice of means.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information