Table of Contents

The Political Economy of International Law

The Political Economy of International Law

A European Perspective

Edited by Alberta Fabbricotti

Set in the context of growing interdisciplinarity in legal research, The Political Economy of International Law: A European Perspective provides a much-needed systematic and coherent review of the interactions between Political Economy and International Law. The book reflects the need felt by international lawyers to open their traditional frontiers to insights from other disciplines - and political economy in particular. The methodological approach of the book is to take the traditional list of topics for a general treatise of international law, and to systematically incorporate insights from political economy to each.

Chapter 11: The Political Economy of International Lawmaking by National Courts

Eyal Benvenisti

Subjects: economics and finance, political economy, law - academic, european law, public international law, politics and public policy, european politics and policy, international relations, political economy


Many scholars who sought to expand the discretion of international courts, and thereby, presumably, to limit State sovereignty above and beyond the original intent of State executives, luminaries such as Scelle, Lauterpacht and Conforti, as well as the members of the Institut de Droit International (IDI), have prodded national courts (referred to as ‘municipal’ or ‘domestic’ courts) to accept their role as local agents of the international legal system. The IDI Resolution from 1993, while acknowledging that a national court has to apply International Law (IL) ‘through its own methods of interpretation within each State’, urges national courts to ‘bas[e] themselves on the methods followed by international tribunals’ and ‘mak[e] every effort to interpret it as it would be interpreted by an international tribunal and avoid […] interpretations influenced by national interests.’ But insights from Political Economy (PE) suggest that this promise faces serious challenges. National constitutions and domestic politics heavily shape the scope of discretion that national courts enjoy. Throughout the twentieth century, domestic pressures led national courts to adopt a deferential attitude towards their respective executive branches. And when, since the early 2000s, national courts of key countries in Europe and Asia have begun to change course, they have sought to chart their own courses and explored unique trajectories for the development and implementation of IL rather than simply mimicking international courts. As this Chapter will suggest, insights from PE can offer an explanation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information