Table of Contents

Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights

Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights

Edited by Martin Scheinin, Helle Krunke and Marina Aksenova

This book considers the many challenges that national and supranational judges have to face when fulfilling their roles as guardians of constitutionalism and human rights. The contributors, both academics and judges, discuss key examples of contemporary challenges to judging – including the nature of courts’ legitimacy and its alleged dependence on public support; the role of judges in upholding constitutional values in the times of transition to democracy, surveillance and the fight against terrorism; and the role of international judges in guaranteeing globally recognized fundamental rights and freedoms.

Chapter 10: The role of the judiciary in Egypt’s failed transition to democracy

Antoni Abat i Ninet

Subjects: law - academic, constitutional and administrative law, criminal law and justice, human rights, law and society


Antoni Abat i Ninet, Professor of comparative constitutional law. This chapter illustrates the inter-institutional dynamics and the fundamental role a constitutional court can play in a transition, the challenges when the court is heavily involved or alternatively when it plays a more reserved role. The chapter deals with the role that judges and more precisely the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt (SCC) played in the transitional moment, i.e. in the aftermath of the authoritarian regime of Hosni Mubarak and up to the 2015’s judicial activity under the mandate of Abdelfatah al Sisi. The distinct nature of a transitional period is characterized by a legal and political uncertainty that places judges as guardians of constitutionalism and human rights in an uncharacteristic position. Because of this concrete casuistry, the dilemma between judicial activism and judicial restraint and the repercussion of judicial activity in transitional periods seem to be more transcendent. The chapter explores the specific nature of the judiciary in Egypt in three different stages - a limited independence under Mubarak, an open conflict against Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood and connivance and co-participation with Sisi´s legal and political repression. The special emphasis is on political role that the SCC has been playing in Egypt since its creation in 1979. The chapter advocates for judicial restraint in transitional periods as a way to safeguard the transition and preserve some legal certainty and stability. The period of transition has a term of expiration and once the transition is over the judiciary may be an active guardian of constitutionalism and human rights.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information