A Short Introduction to Judging and to Legal Reasoning

A Short Introduction to Judging and to Legal Reasoning

Geoffrey Samuel

This Short Introduction looks at judging and reasoning from three perspectives: what legal reasoning has been; what legal reasoning is from the view of judges and jurists themselves (the internal view); and what legal reasoning is from the view of a social scientist epistemologist or humanities specialist (the external view). Combining cases and materials with original text, this unique, concise format is designed for students who are starting out on their law programmes, as well as for students and researchers who would like to examine judging and legal reasoning in more depth.

Chapter 2: Judging and legal reasoning today (‘official portrait’) (1)

Geoffrey Samuel

Subjects: law - academic, criminal law and justice, law and society, legal philosophy, legal theory, research methods in law, research methods, research methods in law


Roman law might not be directly relevant to the common law but it was the basis of European ‘legal science’. This science was to be very influential on common law thought during the 19th century which saw the abolition of the forms of action. Thus Roman legal thinking, as developed by the medieval and later jurists, helped shape what might be called the models of legal reasoning. Various models, as we have seen (see 1.9), can be traced back to the Roman lawyers as interpreted by the later European jurists. The Digest of Roman law largely consists of practical cases. The Romans developed a whole range of legal concepts such as ownership, possession, contract and so on but rather than define them they preferred to test them with reference to factual examples. Nevertheless the very last title to the Digest is called De regulis iuris, which means ‘rules of law’. Thus if one asks what it is to have legal knowledge, the answer that one might often receive – although not from the Romans themselves (see D.50.17.1) – is this. Law is a matter of rules; and thus learning the law is learning and applying legal rules. There are plenty of legal theorists who subscribe to and support this vision of legal knowledge. The primary function of a judge is, accordingly, to find and to apply the appropriate rules to the relevant facts of a litigation dispute.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information