Chapter 3: Interim conclusion
An attribution works like a decryption device between the art object and the public’s perception. It enables the viewer to understand the art object and to place it in its artistic and historical context. Through its attribution, the viewer can differentiate the art object’s creator, age, provenance, technique, form and movement from other art objects. An attribution shapes our qualitative understanding of the art object in that it generates a certain esteem of the work’s aesthetic, historicity or technicality. At the same time, it may trigger a desire to own the art object. An attribution forms the bridge between scholarship and the art object. It expresses the results of scholarly analysis on each of the art object’s attributes. Only once accepted by the expert authority will a new attribution prevail in the market. Thus, an attribution is not the outcome of a consensus among all scholars, but instead reflects the opinion of a single prevalent expert.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.